Inside Florida Real Estate: Brought to you by - Beck Properties, LLC: A Florida Real Estate Consulting Firm

Choose a Topic:

Tue
27
Mar '07

How to Handle Low Ball Offers

By M. Anthony Carr
March 9, 2007
If your house has been on the market for quite a while (3 to 6 months), you may have already dropped your price and now you’re waiting for the buyers to rush in and make wonderful offers on this now-priced right property. And then it happens.

The lone buyer does appear, like a bandit in the night and offers you even less than what you just agreed to. Quite a bit less — about 10 percent less. So on your $350,000 house, that you just dropped to $324,000, you now have an offer for $299,000. With a seller subsidy request of $5,000. At this point, your net is $294,000.

So how do you handle such a low-ball offer. Well, first of all — don’t panic, get angry or lose sleep. Especially, don’t reject the offer right off the bat and tell them to come back when they’re serious. Remember, it’s now a negotiation game and the buyer IS serious or he or she would not have made an offer.

Several things have happened before this offer came in. The buyer, with his agent, has researched the market, walked through as many as 30 or 50 properties, conducted a study on the value of the property and written an offer for your house. Remember, you just won the lottery. They could have written on any other house, but they selected yours. So let’s get busy.

First of all, do an analysis of your own goals and needs. How much do you really need to come out of this house to meet your goals of moving to your next home? What could you really live with and what amount are you going to counter. Remember this last point — what are you going to counter? This is assuming that you’re not rolling over and that you’re going to stay in the game.

Next, conduct a comparative market analysis of the house once again. What’s happened in the market to get this buyer to offer such an offer (notice I didn’t say ‘low’). It might be that your house is now worth that amount. And if it is — that’s okay, because it probably means the house you wanted to buy up into is also worth less. At the worse, you’re going to take away less money. The best thing to look at, however, is that now you’re going to buy up with a smaller down payment because the buy-up property is also less.

Now, let’s start the negotiation. Keep in mind, this is for the long haul. Keep it alive as long as the buyer will keep it alive. Give up a little bit at a time. If you reduced the house to $324,000, expecting an offer of $319,999 with closing costs of $10,000 — then start there. You’re already willing to accept a net of $309,999, so you’re not really that far off. Understand you’re not going to get top dollar with no seller subsidy. So come down to $320,000 and give them their closing costs. So now, your net has come up to $315,000.

Hey — you’re actually ahead of the game if they accept. Oops — they don’t. Now they’ve countered to $309,000 and still want the $5,000 in closing. (Now our net’s at $304,000). Great. Just think. When you started, you were $324,000 apart (remember, you had NO offer at all). Now, you’re only $5,999 away from the net you were willing to accept in the first place.

We’re almost there. Now, before I go much further, here’s a negotiation tip — keep this civil. Use a lot of complements about the offer, the buyers and the agent. “What a great offer. Thanks so much for writing. We are very excited about selling this house to you.”

You want the buyer agent and his/her clients to know you’re wanting to work with them. You’ve been waiting six months for this day (negotiation day) and you want to keep everyone engaged in the process to get your goals met — sold and on your way to your new home in the country.

Now offer your final counter (or maybe next to final). You definitely want to use the complements at this point: “We are so close.” “I can’t wait till we wrap this up, then we can all celebrate.”

At this point, you know the buyers want to buy and your sellers are ready to start packing, so emphasize that you’re very close. Use a dialogue like this: “We are so close. We have some goals to meet, just like you do. And I hope we can bring this together to get us both where we want to be.”

This is when you make the final offer and stick with it. If you offer $314,000, they definitely get what they need and you get closer to your final net — which at this point would be $309,000 — just $999 off of your initial goal. Then you know if it goes forward or you’re back on the market. However, don’t be so stubborn that you lose the lone buyer because of $2,000 or so.

If the buyer is stretching and this won’t work, this is when the honesty comes out. The agent may tell you, If we can’t do $309,000, it’s just not going to work. It goes too far beyond their qualification.” Then you can decide whether to keep it on the market (hoping you don’t have to drop the price again), or you cut the loss and move forward with settlement.

Be patient with the process. Don’t get upset, remember, they’re trying to meet goals just like you are. By working together, both can get what they want.

 

Copyright © 2007 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Mon
26
Mar '07

Negotiation 201: Terms Over Price

By M. Anthony Carr
March 16, 2007
Contrary to popular belief, the bottom line in contract negotiations is not always the bottom line. Obviously, how much you’re going to pay for or gain from the sale of a house is on the top of the spreadsheet; however, there are a certain percentage of contracts that fall apart because of the terms or non-sales price parts of the contract, rather than the financial bottom line.

Let’s take a $350,000 offer on a house listed at $350,000. You would think that’s it. Full price contract, what more is there to talk about? Well — seller subsidies, sale of home contingency, settlement date, financing, earnest money deposit, inspections (and who’s going to pay for them), appraisal, third-party approval, just to mention a few.

Any time the buyer starts asking for things, the seller has to sit back and weigh the costs — both financial and other. Seller subsidies, definitely affect the bottom line. In fact, most agents will say that a contract of $350,000 with 3 percent seller subsidy is really a contract of $339,500. The $10,500 difference is the cost of the 3 percent in dollars. Thus, it affects the bottom line.

While many of the above items come with some sort of financial link, not all do, and that’s where some buyers and sellers can’t come together.

Settlement date is a big one. A “quick” settlement can sometimes be more of a curse than a blessing — especially if the buyer expects the seller to move out at that time. A contract written on the 1st of the month, for instance, requesting a settlement in three weeks (by the 22nd), can cause a lot of havoc in a household. If all we had to deal with were the financial ramifications — no problem.

Quick settlement, though, really means — find a home of choice, in the location you really want, for the price you want, with the amenities you want, convincing the home seller to your own negotiations, get it financed, get packed up, and moved in less than three weeks. Can that happen? Sure … but with quite a bit of panic and stress.

At times, the terms are a matter of “principle,” and sometimes “pride.” While other times a seller may believe that, while the buyer surely can purchase his home, the buyer is just being plain old unreasonable.

Sometimes, it’s the principle of the matter (in the seller’s mind) about whether he should pay for the leaky faucet or leave it as is. “It’s a leaking faucet, for cryin’ out loud,” he might say. “I just gave them $5,000 in closing costs. Let them pay for their own leaky faucet.” To which you may get the buyer to reply: “It’s a leaking faucet, for cryin’ out loud. I just paid him $350,000 for a house … .” I think you get the picture.

Other non-money items could be something like rent-back to the seller, where the home seller becomes home renter for a month while they are trying to find a home of choice. Some buyers are okay with this type arrangement. Another buyer may want a clean break and want possession right after the settlement day.

Sometimes a contract can fall through or the offer not even gets out of the starting blocks, depending on a buyer’s choice of financing and earnest money deposit. Consider two contracts: one is full price ($350,000), with a $2,000 deposit and 100 percent financing. The second one is $345,000 with a $15,000 deposit and financing of $245,000 with a $100,000 deposit. Which buyer do you think has more to lose?

Obviously, it’s the second one, even though the sales price is $5,000 less. While the seller may walk away with less money, he at least has a stronger sense of security that the transaction will go to settlement since the buyer knows if he messes up he could lose his $15,000.

As you can see, it’s not always about dollars and cents. Many times, it’s about dollars and common sense.

 

Copyright © 2007 Realty Times. All Rights Reserved.
Fri
23
Mar '07

Existing-Home Sales Post ‘Surprising’ Gains

Existing-home sales rose strongly in February reaching the highest level since last April, and follows a healthy gain from January, according to the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®.

Total existing-home sales — including single-family, townhomes, condominiums, and co-ops — rose 3.9 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 6.69 million units in February from a downwardly revised level of 6.44 million in January. Still, the numbers are 3.6 percent below the 6.94 million-unit pace in February 2006.

Nevertheless, last month’s increase was the biggest monthly rise in three years — sales last rose 3.9 percent in March 2004.

David Lereah, NAR’s chief economist, says the strong gain is a bit of a surprise.

“Some of the rise in home sales may be from mild weather that brought out shoppers in December, but fundamentals have improved in the housing market and buyers see a window now with historically-low mortgage interest rates and competitive pricing by sellers,” he says. “Even so, winter storms last month discouraged shopping, and buyers were chilled with the third coldest February on record. These unusual weather patterns mean home sales that close in March may decline before rebounding later this spring.”

According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage was 6.16 percent in the last week, down from an average of 6.29 percent in February. The 30-year fixed rate was 6.22 percent in January, and 6.25 percent in February 2006.

NAR President: Median Home Price Distorted

The national median existing-home price for all housing types was $212,800 in February, down 1.3 percent from February 2006 when the median was $215,700. The median is a typical market price where half of the homes sold for more and half sold for less.

NAR President Pat Vredevoogd Combs says the median home price currently is distorted. “Over the last year, we’ve seen declining sales in many high-cost areas but rising activity in lower cost markets,” she says. “This change in the geographic composition of sales means we aren’t getting apples-to-apples comparisons in median home prices from a year ago.”

Other indices examining sales of the same properties over time, such as the OFHEO House Price Index, have been showing price gains; however, the OFHEO index is limited to conventional financing.

“What’s really happening is probably somewhere in between the different measures, but home prices are soft — a year ago we were still seeing bidding pressures and double-digit price growth,” Combs says. “Overall, home prices should rise slowly this year, and many buyers have an opportunity now that was only a dream during the five-year boom.”

A Closer Peek at Sales

Some other key findings from NAR’s latest housing report:

  • Total housing inventory levels rose 5.9 percent at the end of February to 3.75 million existing homes available for sale. That represents a 6.7-month supply at the current sales pace compared with a 6.6-month supply in January. Raw inventories peaked last July at 3.86 million, and supplies topped at 7.4 months in October.
  • Single-family home sales increased 3.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.88 million in February, from 5.67 million in January. But those sales numbers are 3.4 percent below the 6.09 million-unit pace in February 2006. The median existing single-family home price was $211,100 in February, down 1.5 percent from a year ago.
  • Existing condominium and co-op sales jumped 5.3 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 810,000 units in February, from a level of 769,000 in January. February sales are 5.2 percent below the 854,000-unit pace in February 2006. The median existing condo price was $225,400 in February, up 0.5 percent from a year earlier.

Regional Snapshot

Here’s a closer look by region of existing-home sales in February:

  • Northeast: existing-home sales surged 14.2 percent to a level of 1.21 million in February, and are 3.4 percent higher than February 2006. The median existing-home price in the Northeast was $265,900, down 1.4 percent from a year earlier.
  • Midwest: existing-home sales rose 3.9 percent in February to a level of 1.58 million, but are 1.9 percent below a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $157,000, down 1.3 percent from February 2006.
  • South: existing-home sales increased 1.6 percent to an annual sales rate of 2.58 million in February, but are 4.4 percent below February 2006. The median price in the South was $175,900, down 2.9 percent from a year ago.
  • West: existing-home sales went unchanged in February, holding at an annual pace of 1.32 million. Sales are 9.6 percent lower than a year ago. The median price in the West was $337,100, up 2.2 percent from February 2006.

— REALTOR® Magazine Online

Wed
21
Mar '07

Florida House takes up affordable housing measure

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. – March 20, 2007 – Florida’s House Committee on Infrastructure is considering legislation proposed by its chairman, Rep. Mike Davis (R-Naples), that aims to build on affordable-housing programs approved last year.
The bill would provide additional housing assistance to teachers and other public servants and base the taxable value of affordable housing on rental income. It also would waive a rule that forces developers to ensure that roads can accommodate anticipated numbers of new residents, provided that their units are affordable and near commercial areas.
According to Davis, “We’re trying to get at breaking down some of the barriers to private sector participation in affordable housing.”

Source: Naples Daily News (FL) (03/20/07) Peltier, Michael
 

© Copyright 2007 INFORMATION, INC. Bethesda, MD (301) 215-4688